LARGE SAMPLE STATISTICAL INFERENCE FOR AN UNUSUAL PARTIALLY NESTED DESIGN.GAMES PA.1977; J. EXPER. EDUC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 45; NO 3; PP. 36-37; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

SELECTION OF DEFINING CONTRASTS IN TWO-LEVEL EXPERIMENTS. A MODIFICATION.GREENFELD AA.1978; APPL. STATIST.; G.B.; DA. 1978; VOL. 27; NO 1; PP. 78; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

LANG. ENGHOLLINGSWORTH H.1978; J. EXPER. EDUC.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 46; NO 4; PP. 4-6; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

THE RATIONALE OF SCHEFFE'S METHOD AND THE SIMULTANEOUS TEST PROCEDUREBOIK RJ.1979; EDUC. PSYCHOL. MEASUR.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 39; NO 1; PP. 49-56; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

USE OF INTER-BLOCK INFORMATION TO OBTAIN UNIFORMLY BETTER ESTIMATORS OF TREATMENT CONTRASTSMEJZA S.1978; MATH. OPER.-FORSCH. STATIST., STATIST.; DDR; DA. 1978; VOL. 9; NO 3; PP. 335-341; ABS. GER/RUS; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

A CONCISE FORMULA TO COMPUTE GENERAL ORTHOGONAL CONTRAST COEFFICIENTSACKERMANN H.1979; BIOMETR. J.; DDR; DA. 1979; VOL. 21; NO 7; PP. 597-606; ABS. GER; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF MEAN SEPARATION TECHNIQUES.PETERSEN MR; BUTCHER DF; WEARDEN S et al.1978; J. STATIST. COMPUT. SIMUL.; GBR; DA. 1978; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 33-54; BIBL. 1 P.Article

A COMPARISON OF THE MODIFIED-TUKEY AND SCHEFFE METHODS OF MULTIPLE COMPARISONS FOR PAIRWISE CONTRASTS.KESELMAN HJ; ROGAN JC.1978; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 73; NO 361; PP. 47-52; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

AN IMPROVED T TABLE FOR SIMULTANEOUS CONTROL ON G CONTRASTS.GAMES PA.1977; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 72; NO 359; PP. 531-534; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

ON PARTITIONING MEANS INTO GROUPSCOX DR; SPJOTVOLL E.1982; SCAND. J. STAT.; ISSN 0303-6898; SWE; DA. 1982; VOL. 9; NO 3; PP. 147-152; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

FURTHER TABLES OF THE STUDENTIZED MAXIMUM MODULUS DISTRIBUTIONURY HK; STOLINE MR; MITCHELL BT et al.1980; COMMUNIC. STATIST., SIMUL. COMPUT.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 9; NO 2; PP. 167-178; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

TREATMENT CONTRASTS IN PAIRED COMPARISONS: LARGE-SAMPLE RESULTS, APPLICATION, AND SOME OPTIMAL DESIGNSEL HELBAWY AT; BRADLEY RA.1978; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 73; NO 364; PP. 831-839; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

SELECTION OF DEFINING CONTRASTS AND CONFOUNDED EFFECTS IN TWO-LEVEL EXPERIMENTS.FRANKLIN MF; BAILEY RA.1977; APPL. STATIST.; G.B.; DA. 1977; VOL. 26; NO 3; PP. 321-326; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

ON THE T-METHOD OF MULTIPLE-COMPARISON.MARGARITESCU E.1976; REV. ROUMAINE MATH. PURES APPL.; ROUMAN.; DA. 1976; VOL. 21; NO 8; PP. 1063-1069; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

Estimating the variance of empirical logits and contrasts in empirical log probabilitiesBEDRICK, E. J.Biometrics. 1984, Vol 40, Num 3, pp 805-809, issn 0006-341XArticle

EXACT AND APPROXIMATE DISTRIBUTIONS FOR LINEAR CONTRASTS OF MEANS AND VARIANCESCHECHILE RA.1979; COMMUNIC. STATIST., THEORY METHODS; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 8; NO 5; PP. 447-461; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

MULTIPLE COMPARISONS EMPHASIZING SELECTED CONTRASTS: AN EXTENSION AND GENERALIZATION OF DUNNETT'S PROCEDURE.SHAFFER JP.1977; BIOMETRICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 33; NO 2; PP. 293-303; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

SIMULTANEOUS CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR ALL LINEAR CONTRASTS OF MEANS WITH HETEROGENOUS VARIANCESKAISER LD.1983; COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS. THEORY AND METHODS; ISSN 0361-0926; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 12; NO 1; PP. 73-88; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

TESTING LINEAR CONTRASTS OF MEANS IN EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN WITHOUT ASSUMING NORMALITY AND HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCESTIKU ML.1982; BIOMETRISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT; ISSN 0006-3452; DDR; DA. 1982; VOL. 24; NO 6; PP. 613-627; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ONE-WAY LAYOUT FOR COUNTS AND THE EXACT ENUMERATION OF THE KRUSKAL-WALLIS H DISTRIBUTION WITH TIES.KLOTZ J; TENG J.1977; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 72; NO 357; PP. 165-169; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

TREATMENT CONTRAST IN PAIRED COMPARISONS: BASIC PROCEDURES WITH APPLICATION TO FACTORIALS.BRADLEY RA; EL HELBAWY AT.1976; BIOMETRIKA; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 63; NO 2; PP. 255-262; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

TWO CRITERIA FOR THE COMPARISON OF MULTIPLE ARRANGEMENTS OF EXPERIMENTS AND THEIR USE TO ANSWER THE QUESTION: IS IT BETTER TO COMPARE P TREATMENT GROUPS WITH P CONTROLS OR WITH A SINGLE CONTROLHORN M.1979; BIOMETR. J.; DDR; DA. 1979; VOL. 21; NO 3; PP. 247-258; ABS. GER; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

A PRIORI TESTS IN REPEATED MEASURES DESIGNS: EFFECTS OF NONSPHERICITYBOIK RJ.1981; PSYCHOMETRIKA; ISSN 0033-3123; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 46; NO 3; PP. 241-255; BIBL. 2 P.Article

TREATMENT CONTRASTS IN PAIRED COMPARISONS: CONVERGENCE OF A BASIC ITERATIVE SCHEME FOR ESTIMATION.EL HELBAWY AT; BRADLEY RA.1977; COMMUNIC. STATIST., THEORY METHODS; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 197-207; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

A geometric description of orthogonal contrasts in one-way analysis of varianceSCHEY, H. M.The American statistician. 1985, Vol 39, Num 2, pp 104-106, issn 0003-1305Article